Going Racing Is No Longer Optional: Why Emotion Will Decide the Future of Car Sales
Racing series such as F1 and the WEC are experiencing a new “Golden Age”.
So why are some brands still on the sidelines?
Why are participants pulling the plug on their programs?
Boards and shareholders will say many things about racing, none having to do with the on-track action.
Racing is too expensive.
It’s too niche.
It’s too disconnected from modern buyers.
In an era defined by electrification, software, and regulation, motorsport is framed as a legacy indulgence; useful for engineers, irrelevant for sales.
That logic is dangerously outdated at best, and completely wrong at worst.
The global auto market is entering a phase where functional differentiation is collapsing, and nowhere is this more visible than in the rise of Chinese manufacturers.
These brands are faster, cheaper, better integrated, and increasingly competitive on quality.
They win on price.
They win on features.
They win on speed of execution.
What they do not win on is emotion.
And that is precisely why racing has never been more important.
Don’t want to be left behind?
Subscribe to Return On Racing — the weekly newsletter from Vaucher Analytics covering actionable motorsports strategy, cost breakdowns, and sponsor intel.
The Chinese EV shock has changed the rules
Chinese automakers have shattered the assumptions legacy brands relied on for decades.
They are not constrained by legacy platforms, dealership inertia, or slow decision cycles.
Quite the opposite in fact: they design and ship compelling products extremely quickly, that are aggressively priced, and packed with technology.
There is a constant, ruthless churn in the Chinese automaker landscape that surfaces successful models in a way that legacy automakers can’t keep up with.
For the average buyer and for legacy automobile manufacturers, the uncomfortable truth is this: many cars today are just “good enough”.
Are they truly good enough to justify an average price of $50,000?
At that price, consumers are forced to compare minute specification details to build their comparison lists, and in that process, something happens.
Their eyes glaze over.
They lose track of which model is which.
And all cars, maybe the ones your company sells, start to look the same.
When products converge, brand recognition, not specs, is the only thing that will make you stand out.
This is where most legacy brands find themselves exposed today.
They cannot beat China at a game for which they have set the rules; attempting to do so is a race to the bottom legacy brands will lose.
Their only remaining defensible advantage is identity.
Cars are not bought rationally, they’re justified rationally
Car purchases have always been emotional. Consumers buy because the car represents something: status, taste, rebellion, competence, aspiration.
Specs only justify the purchase after desire is created, and this is how brands can survive Chinese competition.
Chinese brands compete brilliantly on justification.
Legacy brands must compete on desire.
Racing, done properly, is not about lap times or trophies.
It is about creating meaning, a reason for a consumer to care about your brand instead of the cheaper, equally (maybe even more) competent alternative.
Racing is the last emotional asset legacy automotive brands still own
Racing cannot be reverse-engineered in a lab.
It cannot be replicated through software updates, and it cannot be fast-tracked with venture capital.
Heritage, credibility, and competitive mythology take decades to build, and many brands, the same ones struggling in the face of current and future Chinese competition, already have them.
Le Mans, WRC, DTM, IMSA, F1: these are not just sporting platforms.
They are emotion factories.
They create stories of endurance, ingenuity, risk, sacrifice, and triumph that no spec sheet can replicate.
More tangibly, they create broadcast-ready images and footage, with no AI gimmicks, and that will count at a time when consumers, especially Gen Z, want authenticity.
Yet most automakers treat racing as a siloed expense rather than the most potent branding asset they possess.
That is the real problem: not whether racing is worth doing (because it is), but whether its value is being extracted at all.
The racing emotion gap
Due to siloing in large companies, there is a gap between what racing could do for an automaker and what it actually delivers in market impact; this gap only grows the longer legacy automakers hesitate faced with what is coming.
Most brands spend enormous sums to go racing and then:
Produce minimal consumer-facing content
Fail to connect race success to road cars
Isolate motorsport from mainstream campaigns
Neglect dealerships and sales teams
Leave emotion on the table
The result is predictable: racing becomes valued by those who participate in it, but the stakeholders cutting the checks don’t see the value.
Racing stops, and brand value recedes.
A brand which does this is a brand that is doomed to cease existing in the next several decades.
Racing fails at its main purpose if it does not justify its investment
Premium pricing requires a premium story.
Porsche and Ferrari are not transportation companies, they are lifestyle companies, the “accessories” they sell just happen to have engines rather than diamonds or monograms.
They sell identity forged through competition.
Racing success becomes a halo that legitimizes higher prices, stronger loyalty, and long-term brand equity.
If a brand races but cannot point to:
Higher willingness to pay
Increased brand consideration
Stronger loyalty
Cultural relevance
Then racing, or rather, company management, have failed at realizing a marketing investment, even if the racing team, siloed in its own way, succeeded on-track.
Racing is becoming mandatory again, but only if it is converted properly
Here is the uncomfortable truth many marketers are avoiding:
As Chinese brands expand globally, legacy automobile brands will be forced back into racing, not because they want to, but because their competitors will.
Chinese auto brands will make their own legends on the race track, and some have already announced grand plans.
The mistake would be thinking that participation alone is enough.
Racing without conversion is just an expensive hobby.
The future belongs to brands that can:
Translate motorsport into mainstream emotional appeal
Integrate racing into the entire customer journey
Turn heritage into relevance
Convert storytelling into sales justification
A simple question every legacy automobile leader must now ask
Before approving another racing budget, every automotive marketer should be forced to answer one question:
“Are we extracting the maximum emotional and commercial value from our racing program, or are we just funding it?”
If the answer is unclear, racing is not the problem.
Marketing is.
The new strategic reality in the legacy automobile and motorsport worlds
The car market is splitting in two:
Brands people buy because they are cheap, competent, and rational
Brands people buy because they mean something
Racing is the dividing line.
In a commoditized automotive future, emotion is not optional.
It is the business model.
And racing, properly leveraged, is how legacy automakers stay relevant in a world that is about to leave them behind.
Are you ready to optimize your automotive potential?
Vaucher Analytics helps automotive brands, race teams and manufacturers turn racing heritage and capability into brand capital.
If you’re unsure of how to bring new fans and buyers in and keep them coming back, we’re here to help.
Book your 30-minute discovery call by contacting us today:
Through our website’s contact form, or
Via email at contact@vaucheranalytics.com
Main image credit: Chris Robert via Unsplash